"The Uncertainty Principle"- studying immediate lymphatic reconstruction impacts the natural history of breast cancer related lymphedema.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a life-altering sequela for patients and a challenging problem for their surgeons. In order to prevent BCRL, immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is a surgical technique that has been devised to restore lymphatic drainage to the operative limb. Although ILR is becoming popular in the literature, we have identified several challenges within our own ILR research, including a lack of a clear definition of lymphedema, a lack of common outcome measures and possible alteration of the natural history of lymphedema through early compression therapy. Given these challenges, we must move forward with caution, while striving to develop clear and universally agreed upon definitions and outcomes, so that we can advance the body of evidence in support of ILR.

Orthotopic vascularized lymph node transfer in breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment: Functional and life quality outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic disease that occurs up to 65% of breast cancer survivors. Traditional treatment is conservative, but new surgeries as lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) are at disposal. This study aims to investigate the orthotopic VLNT efficacy in BCRL. Results in terms of limbs' reduction rates and quality of life improvement are compared with the outcomes reported in Literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During patients' selection, inclusion criteria were monolateral ISL stage II or III BCRL with pathologic lymphoscintigraphy imaging and a minimum of previous 6 months of unsuccessful conservative treatment. Bilateral lymphedema, local recurrence or systemic metastasis, acute infection of the limb and deep venous trombosis were exclusion criteria. Surgery consisted in VLNT from the gastroepiploic region to the axilla with axillary scar dissection. RESULTS: From August 2019 to December 2021, 25 patients were included. At the preoperative scintigraphy exam, mean lymph transport index (TI) was 30 (range; 22.7-29.3). Nine of them (36%) were ISL stage II and 16 (64%) were stage III. Average follow-up was 13.5 months (range; 12-19 months). VLN flaps' survival rate was 100%. One year after surgery, the mean Circumferential Reduction Rate (CRR) resulted 44.62 (range; 27.4-60.3). Infections' rates presented a statistically significant reduction, from an average of 2.4 (range; 1-4) to 0.2 (range; 0-1) episodes per year. Life quality index measured with the LYMQOL questionnaire showed significant improvement after 1 year, from a mean score of 3.28 (range; 2-5) to 8.12 (range; 7-9). CONCLUSION: When compared with Literature evidence, the results of the current study are in line with both VLN inset ways related to BCRL treatment. An optimal therapeutic choice should consider benefits and drawbacks of each orthotopic and heterotopic VLNT, taking into account surgeon's preference and experience and patients' related factors and expectations.

Lymphatic remapping by long-term lymphoscintigraphy follow-up in secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery.

The purpose of the study is to investigate long-term changes on lymphoscintigraphy and their association with clinical factors in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) patients. This single-center cohort study included BCRL patients who underwent baseline and follow-up lymphoscintigraphy. The percentage of excessive circumference (PEC) of the affected upper limb compared with the unaffected side was used as an indicator of the clinical severity of BCRL. Each 99mTc-phytate lymphoscintigraphy image was categorized according to the Taiwan lymphoscintigraphy staging system. Clinical parameters and the lymphoscintigraphy stage at baseline and follow-up were compared and analyzed. Eighty-seven patients were included. Baseline and follow-up lymphoscintigraphies were performed at median 7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2‒14) and 78 (IQR: 49‒116) months after surgery, respectively. Both lymphoscintigraphy stage and PEC showed variable change with overall increases in their severity. Stepwise multivariable analysis revealed follow-up lymphoscintigraphy stage (P = 0.001) to be independent variables for PEC at follow-up, however, baseline lymphoscintigraphy stage was not. The clinical courses of BCRL and patients' lymphoscintigraphy patterns showed diverse changes over long-term follow-up. In addition to initial lymphoscintigraphy for diagnosis, lymphatic remapping by follow-up lymphoscintigraphy can be useful to visualize functional changes in the lymphatic system that may guide the optimal management in BCRL.

Optimal Cut-Off Value for Detecting Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Ultrasonography.

Background: We previously devised an ultrasonographic evaluation to calculate subcutaneous tissue cross-sectional area (△CSA). The reliability and accuracy of this method were demonstrated in healthy individuals and in patients with lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to estimate the optimal cut-off value of the ratio of the △CSA of the involved side (lesion side) to the contralateral side for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) using ultrasonography. Methods and Results: Ultrasonographic measurements were performed 290 times in 150 patients. BCRLD was defined as a confirmed difference of >2 cm in arm circumference. BCRL confirmed by a clinician (BCRLC) was defined as the patient group that included not only BCRLD but also patients with subcutaneous thickening and abnormal findings on lymphoscintigraphy, even if the difference in arm circumference was <2 cm. The △CSAs of both upper arms and forearms were calculated by measuring the thickness of the subcutaneous tissue at four locations using ultrasonography (superior, medial, inferior, lateral) at 10 cm above the elbow and 10 cm below the elbow. With a 1.35 △CSA ratio as the cut-off value for detecting BCRLD, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.88, 0.87, and 0.95, respectively. With a 1.20 △CSA ratio as the cut-off value for detecting BCRLC, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.92, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a 1.20 △CSA ratio as determined using ultrasonography, corresponding to a tape measurement of 1.05 cm, can be considered as a diagnostic criterion for lymphedema.

Immediate-delayed lymphatic reconstruction after axillary lymph nodes dissection for locally advanced breast cancer-related lymphedema prevention: Report of two cases.

Approximately 60%-70% of breast cancer patients in Indonesia are diagnosed in the locally advanced stage. The stage carries a higher risk of lymph node metastasis which increases susceptibility to lymph obstruction. Hence, breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) could present before axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The purpose of this case report is to describe immediate-delayed lymphatic reconstructions with lymphaticovenous anastomosis in two subclinical lymphedema cases that present before ALND. There were 51 and 58 years old breast cancer patients with stage IIIC and IIIB, respectively. Both had no arm lymphedema symptoms, but arm lymphatic vessel abnormalities were found during preoperative indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography. Mastectomy and ALND were performed and proceeded with lymphaticovenous anastomoses (LVA) in both cases. One LVA at the axilla (isotopic) was done in the first patient. On the second patient, 3 LVAs at the affected arm (ectopic) and 3 isotopic LVAs were created. The patients were discharged on the second day without complications during the follow-up. The intensity of dermal backflow was reduced, and no subclinical lymphedema progression occurred during 11 and 9 months follow-up, respectively. Based on these cases, BCRL screening might be recommended for the locally advanced stage before cancer treatment. Once diagnosed, immediate lymphatic reconstruction after ALND should be recommended to cure or prevent BCRL progression.

Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: Recent Updates on Clinical Efficacy of Therapies and Bioengineering Approaches for a Personalized Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Post-mastectomy lymphedema is a chronic progressive disease characterized by a significant reduction in quality of life and a range of complications. AIM: To this date, no single treatment method provides pathological correction of the mechanisms associated with tissue reorganization observed in later-stage breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: To define a personalized approach to the management of patients with iatrogenic lymphedema, we performed a systematic review of literature without a comprehensive meta-analysis to outline existing molecular- genetic patterns, overview current treatment methods and their efficacy, and highlight the specific tissue-associated changes in BCRL conditions and other bio-engineering approaches to develop personalized therapy. RESULTS: Our results show that several tissue-specific and pathological molecular markers may be found, yet current research does not aim to define them. CONCLUSION: As such, currently, a strong foundation for further research into molecular-genetic changes in lymphedema tissue exists, and further research should focus on finding specific targets for personalized treatment through bio-engineering approaches.

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: An Umbrella Review.

BACKGROUND: Identification of risk factors facilitates the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Several published systematic reviews have already addressed the risk factors for BCRL. This study aimed to systematically identify potential risk factors for BCRL and evaluate the quality of evidence. METHODS: The study followed methodologic guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the Cochrane Handbook. The following electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to 15 November 2022: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, JBI Database, Cochrane Database, ProQuest, and PROSPERO. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodologic quality using AMSTAR2, risk of bias using ROBIS, and evidence quality using GRADE. The study evaluated overlap, assessed the small-study effect, and calculated the I2 statistic and Egger's P value as needed. RESULTS: The study included 14 publications comprising 10 meta-analyses and 4 systematic reviews. The authors identified 39 factors and 30 unique meta-analyses. In the study, 13 innate personal trait-related risk factors, such as higher body mass index (BMI) and axillary lymph nodes dissection, showed statistically significant associations with BCRL incidence. Breast reconstruction was found to be a protective factor. The methodologic quality was low or critically low. The majority of the systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were rated as having a high risk of bias. Evidence quality was low for 22 associations and moderate for 8 associations. CONCLUSIONS: The currently identified risk factors for BCRL all are innate personal trait-related factors. Future well-designed studies and robust meta-analyses are needed to explore potential associations between behavioral-, interpersonal-, and environmental-related factors and BCRL, as well as the role of genetic variations and pathophysiologic factors.

Establishment and Feasibility of an Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Program in a Community Health System.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) remains a significant post-surgical complication of breast cancer treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has shown promise in preventing BCRL. While the primary literature supporting ILR comes from academic institutions, the majority of breast cancer care in the USA occurs in the community setting. This study evaluated a preventative lymphedema program performing ILR at a community health system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database including all patients who underwent ALND with concurrently attempted ILR from 2019 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The historical benchmark lymphedema rate was calculated through retrospective review of electronic medical records for all patients who underwent ALND without ILR from 2011 to 2021. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent ALND with ILR, of which ILR was successful in 69 (76.7%). ILR was more likely to be aborted in smokers (p < 0.05) and those with fewer lymphatic channels (p < 0.05) or a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.08). Patients with successful versus aborted ILR had lower lymphedema rates (10.9% versus 66.7%, p < 0.01) and improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (8.7 versus 19.8, p = 0.25), and lower lymphedema rates than the historical benchmark (10.9% versus 50.2%, p < 0.01). Among patients with successful ILR, older patients were more likely to develop lymphedema (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Successful ILR after ALND significantly reduced the lymphedema rate when compared with patients with aborted ILR and our institution's historical benchmark. Our experience supports the efficacy of ILR and highlights the feasibility of ILR within a community health system.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer-related lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could be a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) associated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 596 patients with cT0-4N0-3M0 breast cancer who underwent ALND and chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed between March 2012 and March 2022. NAC was administered in 188 patients (31.5%), while up-front surgery in 408 (68.5%). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine whether NAC was an independent risk factor for BCRL. With propensity score matching (PSM), the NAC group and up-front surgery group were matched 1:1 by age, body mass index (BMI), molecular subtypes, type of breast surgery, and the number of positive lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for BCRL between groups before and after PSM. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore whether NAC differed for BCRL occurrence in people with different characteristics. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, 130 patients (21.8%) experienced BCRL [NAC, 50/188 (26.60%) vs. up-front surgery, 80/408 (19.61%); P = 0.030]. Multivariable analysis identified that NAC [hazard ratio, 1.503; 95% CI (1.03, 2.19); P = 0.033] was an independent risk factor for BCRL. In addition, the hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR-/HER2-) subtype, breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and increased positive lymph nodes significantly increased BCRL risk. After PSM, NAC remained a risk factor for BCRL [hazard ratio, 1.896; 95% CI (1.18, 3.04); P = 0.007]. Subgroup analyses showed that NAC had a consistent BCRL risk in most clinical subgroups. CONCLUSION: NAC receipt has a statistically significant increase in BCRL risk in patients with ALND. These patients should be closely monitored and may benefit from early BCRL intervention.

Breast lymphedema following breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer: current status and future directions.

PURPOSE: To examine the current evidence on breast lymphedema (BL) diagnosis and treatment after breast-conserving surgery, identify gaps in the literature, and propose future research directions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using Ovid, PubMed, and Cochrane, including studies published between 2000 and 2023. References were reviewed manually for eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who underwent breast conserving treatment (surgery ± radiation) for breast cancer, goals of the paper included analyzing or reviewing BL measurement with ultrasound or tissue dielectric constant, or BL treatment. Twenty-seven manuscripts were included in the review. RESULTS: There is variation in incidence, time course, and risk factors for BL. Risk factors for BL included breast size, primary and axillary surgery extent, radiation, and chemotherapy but require further investigation. Diagnostic methods for BL currently rely on patient report and lack standardized criteria. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) and ultrasound (US) emerged as promising ambulatory BL assessment tools; however, diagnostic thresholds and validation studies with ICG lymphography are needed to establish clinical utility. The evidence base for treatment of BL is weak, lacking high-quality studies. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BL is not well defined. TDC and US show promise as ambulatory assessment tools for BL; however, further validation with lymphatic imaging is required. BL treatment is not established in the literature. Longitudinal, prospective studies including pre-radiation measurements and validating with lymphatic imaging are required. These data will inform screening, diagnostic criteria, and evidence-based treatment parameters for patients with BL after breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Long-term Experience on Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema in the Coastal Area of Fukushima, Japan After the 2011 Triple Disaster.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Disasters can jeopardize breast cancer care and Japan's triple disaster in 2011 (earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear accident) is no exception. However, detailed information is lacking regarding the care of breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) following the disaster. We aimed to explore the process by which local patients become aware of BCRL, the problems faced, and the support they require. We also aimed to clarify the effects of the 2011 disaster on experiences related to lymphedema in the target population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who developed BCRL after breast cancer treatment were recruited from Iwaki city, a municipality located in the southern coastal region of Fukushima (N=16). In-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted, and the obtained data were appraised using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Five themes related to BCRL were identified: 1) the process of becoming aware of BCRL, 2) troubles or worries/concerns due to BCRL, 3) information sources regarding BCRL management, 4) strategies to cope with BCRL, and 5) the adverse impacts of the 2011 disaster on BCRL management. CONCLUSION: Except for the disaster context, the themes are in line with those of previous studies conducted in the non-disaster context. Nonetheless, there were limited but non-negligible adverse effects of the 2011 disaster on long-term local BCRL management. The findings of this study demonstrate the necessity for individualizing coping strategies against BCRL among healthcare professionals in the Fukushima coastal area and beyond.

Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage in intensive phase I therapy of breast cancer-related lymphedema-a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The standard therapy for lymphedema of any origin is complex physical decongestive therapy (CDT). It comprises manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression therapy (CT), exercise therapy (ET), skincare, and patient education. Additionally, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) can be applied. However, the contribution of MLD to decongestion is repeatedly questioned. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study re-analyzes a previous study during a 3-week decongestion period, comparing two different types of compression bandaging at the weekend. Sixty-one patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema were included. The patients received the same therapy (CDT + IPC) except for the different weekend compression bandaging. MLD was performed twice a day on weekdays. The volume of the affected arm was measured on days 1, 5, 8, 12, 15, 19, and 22. For the analysis, the data of both study groups were pooled. RESULTS: During the week, the patients showed a significant volume reduction (- 155.23 mL (week 1), - 101.02 mL (week 2), - 61.69 mL (week 3), respectively; p < 0.001 each) with a high effect size. On the weekends without MLD, they showed a slight, but also significant increase (12.08 mL (weekend 1), 8.36 mL (weekend 2), 4.33 mL (weekend 3), respectively; p < 0.001 each) with a medium effect size. CONCLUSIONS: We showed a strong effect of MLD on volume reduction. Differences from other studies are the larger study population and the more intensive application of MLD. If applied intensively, MLD is strongly decongestive during a 3-week decongestion therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Health-related physical fitness parameters in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare health-related physical fitness parameters of women with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) to a matched control group. METHODS: Thirty women with unilateral BCRL (lymphedema group, age = 55.00 (40.00-65.00) years) and 32 healthy women (control group, age = 49.00 (44.00-64.00) years) were included. Cardiorespiratory fitness with the UKK 2-km walk test, grip strength with a hand dynamometer, trunk muscle endurance with the McGill trunk muscle endurance tests, flexibility with the sit and reach test, body composition with a body composition analyzer, and waist-to-hip ratio were assessed. RESULTS: In the lymphedema group, 36.7% of women had mild lymphedema, 36.7% had moderate, and 26.7% had severe lymphedema. It was found that maximal oxygen consumption, physical fitness index, grip strength, trunk extensor and lateral flexor muscle endurance, and flexibility scores were higher in the control group than in the lymphedema group (p < 0.05). In addition, body mass index, body fat percentage, and waist-to-hip ratio were found to be lower in the control group compared to the lymphedema group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the trunk flexor muscle endurance scores (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the health-related physical fitness parameters were adversely affected in women with BCRL compared to healthy women. The changes of physical fitness may be important for the assessment and the treatment of BCRL.

Can Acupuncture be a Part of the Treatment for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Systematic Review of the Safety and Proposed Model for Care.

Acupuncture is a potential therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Despite a recent meta-analysis on efficacy, data on acupuncture safety in BCRL are lacking. Current clinical guidelines recommend avoiding needling in the upper extremity affected by lymph node dissection. We undertook a systematic review focusing on acupuncture safety and treatment protocols in clinical trials for BCRL. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL, and Cochrane library. Eight clinical trials on acupuncture for BCRL were analyzed. The Standards of Acupuncture intervention (STRICTA 2010) and Cochrane risk of bias (RoB2 2019) were applied to assess methods for acupuncture interventions within Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. Quantity and severity of adverse events (AE) were reviewed. A total of 189 subjects participated in 8 clinical trials with 2965 acupuncture treatments. No serious adverse events (SAE) were reported regardless of treatment laterality or protocol, with only a single grade 2 skin infection in 2,965 total treatments (0.034%), including 1,165 bilateral and 225 ipsilateral treatments. Our comprehensive review of clinical trials of acupuncture for BCRL demonstrated no significant adverse events in 2,965 treatments, including 1,390 in the affected limb. An approach for routine integration of acupuncture into BCRL maintenance therapy is proposed.

Analysis of the Risk Factors of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Construction and Evaluation of a Prediction Model.

Objective: The occurrence of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in postoperative breast cancer survivors is described and the independent risk factors of BCRL are analyzed. A BCRL nomogram prediction model is constructed, and its effectiveness is evaluated to screen out high-risk patients with BCRL. Methods: A univariate analysis was carried out to determine the risk factors possibly related to BCRL, and a logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the independent risk factors related to BCRL. A BCRL nomogram prediction model was built, and a nomogram was drawn by R software v4.1.0. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the efficacy of the constructed model to assess its clinical application value. Results: The risk factors independently associated with BCRL were body mass index (BMI), handedness on the operation side, no BCRL-related rehabilitation plan, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), taxane-based chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (all p < 0.05). The BCRL nomogram prediction model was built on this basis, and the results of the efficacy evaluation showed a good fit: AUC = 0.952 (95% confidence interval: 0.930-0.973) for the ROC and χ2 = 6.963, p = 0.540 for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Conclusions: The risk factors for BCRL included higher BMI, handedness on the operation side, no BCRL-related rehabilitation plan, ALND, taxane-based chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In addition, the BCRL nomogram prediction model accurately calculated the risk of possible BCRL among breast cancer survivors and effectively screened for high-risk patients with BCRL. Therefore, this prediction model can provide a basis for rehabilitation physicians and therapists to formulate early and individualized prevention and treatment programs.

Complex physical therapy employing self-adjusting garment (ReadyWrap®) in breast cancer-related lymphedema cases in Brazilian women: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is a common complication following breast cancer treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-adjusting compression garment (ReadyWrap®) in reducing (phase 1) and maintaining (phase 2) upper limb volume in women presenting breast cancer-related lymphedema. METHODS: This study will comprise a randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial concerning women with breast cancer-related lymphedema undergoing treatment at a public cancer treatment reference hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The intervention will be carried out by adapting self-dressing versus the standard treatment of compressive bandaging (phase 1) and compressive mesh (phase 2). Both groups will be assessed at the beginning and end of intensive treatment and followed up for up to 12 months to evaluate immediate and late outcomes. Assessments will be carried out by physical upper limb examination (inspection, palpation, volume, dynamometry, and thermography) and questionnaires application to assess patient's quality of life pertaining to the health, functionality, and symptoms of the affected upper limb, as well adverse effects and adherence to treatment. Data will be analyzed descriptively and analytically through univariate and multiple linear regressions. P values < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a self-adjustable garment (ReadyWrap®) in the treatment of lymphedema secondary to breast cancer in Brazilian women compared to the gold standard treatment for limb volume reduction (phase 1) and maintenance (phase 2) phases comprising, respectively, a compressive bandaging and a compressive mesh. The outcome results will provide data based on both quantitative responses and self-reported participant outcomes. The study will also assess the cost-effectiveness of the ReadyWrap® treatment versus standard care. Finally, we expect to reaffirm one more product/therapy as a treatment for this extremely complex and impactful condition following the data analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04934098 [Clinical trials phase 1]. Registered on June 22, 2021. NCT04881604 [Clinical trials phase 2]. Registered on May 11, 2021.

Development of Pressure Sensors to Help Support Community Lymphedema Monitoring: A Scoping Review.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a condition occurring after a partial or full mastectomy, where there is a buildup of interstitial fluid in the body, particularly in the upper limb. There is a lack of at-home sensors that can help monitor the progression of lymphedema. The purpose of this scoping review is to gather relevant information on sensors for remote lymphedema monitoring. A literature search of Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and BMC databases yielded 96 studies. A total of six studies were selected for data extraction. Data were extracted from each study and organized into tables for analysis. A total of six different devices were mentioned in the six studies included in the scoping review, divided into wearable and nonwearable sensors. Nonwearable sensors were more likely to be adaptable for remote sensing as they were further along in development and commercially available on the market. Nonwearable sensors are more developed than wearable sensors for the purpose of remote lymphedema monitoring. This review advocates further development and validation of sensors for lymphedema management, particularly for remote monitoring and health assessments.

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Long-Term Follow-Up, Surveillance Recommendations, and Multidisciplinary Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and intervention for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) significantly decreases progression to persistent BCRL (pBCRL). We aimed to provide long-term follow-up on our early detection with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and early home intervention demonstrating reduced pBCRL to guide surveillance recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 148 female patients with breast cancer who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) from November 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. Baseline BIS measurements and postoperative follow-up occurred every 3 months for 1 year, biannual for 1 year, and then annually. An elevated BIS triggered evaluation and initiation of at-home interventions with reassessment for resolution versus persistent BCRL (pBCRL). High-risk factors and timing were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 55 months, and 65 (44%) patients had an abnormal BIS. Of these, 54 (82%) resolved with home intervention. The overall pBCRL rate was 8%. Average time to first abnormal BIS was 11.7 months. None of the stage 0 patients (0/34) and only 5/25 (20%) of stage 1 patients had pBCRL. All of stage 2 and stage 3 patients (7/7) had pBCRL. pBCRL correlated with number of positive nodes, percentage of positive nodes, stage of lymphedema at diagnosis, and recurring abnormal BIS measurements (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that patients undergoing ALND with early BCRL identified by BIS who performed home interventions had an 8% pBCRL rate. Patients at high risk for pBCRL should have routine surveillance starting at 9 months postoperatively to identify an opportunity for early intervention.